Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±Ù´ÜºÎ ¼ºÇü Å©±â¿¡ µû¸¥ ´Ù¾çÇÑ Àüµ¿ ´ÏÄÌƼŸ´½ ÆÄÀÏÀÇ Á᫐ º¯À§À² ¹× ¸¸°îµµ °¨¼Ò ºñ±³

Comparison of the centering ratio and canal curvature reduction according to the apical preparation size using various NiTi rotary instruments

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úÀÇ»çÇùȸÁö 2009³â 47±Ç 7È£ p.434 ~ 443
°û»ó¿ø, ¹ÚÁ¤±æ, Ç㺹, ±èÇöö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
°û»ó¿ø ( Kwak Sang-Won ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
¹ÚÁ¤±æ ( Park Jeong-Kil ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
Ç㺹 ( Hur Bock ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
±èÇöö ( Kim Hyeon-Cheol ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç

Abstract

±Ù°ü ³» ±â±¸ Á¶ÀÛÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ±Ù°üÀÇ º¯À§³ª ledge, õ°ø µîÀÇ ¼úÀÚÀÇ ºÎÁÖÀÇ·Î »ý±æ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â À߸øµÈ ¼ºÇü ¾øÀÌ È¿°úÀûÀÎ ¼¼Á¤°ú ÃæÀüÀ» À§ÇØ ÀûÀýÇÑ ±ò¶§±â ¸ð¾çÀÇ ±Ù°üÀ» ¾ò´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù1). ´ÏÄÌƼŸ´½ ÇÕ±ÝÀ¸·Î ¸¸µç ±Ù°ü ¼ºÇü ±â±¸´Â ½ºÅ×Àη¹½º½ºÆ¿ ±â±¸ÀÇ ÇѰ踦 ±Øº¹Çϱâ À§ÇØ °í¾ÈµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ½ºÅ×Àη¹½º½ºÆ¿ ±â±¸¿¡ ºñÇØ ¼ºÇü ½Ã ±Ù°üÀÇ ¿ø·¡ ÇüÅ ¹× ±Ù´Ü°øÀÇ À§Ä¡³ª ¸ð¾çÀ» Àß À¯ÁöÇÑ´Ù°í ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ¿Ô´Ù2). ¶Ç, ´ÏÄÌƼŸ´½ ±â±¸´Â ½ºÅ×Àη¹½º½ºÆ¿ ±â±¸¿¡ ºñÇØ ¾à µÎ ¼¼¹è Á¤µµ ´õ À¯¿¬Çϸç, ÆÄÀý¿¡ À̸£´Â ÃÖ´ë ÅäÅ©°¡ ´õ ¿ì¼öÇÏ´Ù3-6). ´Ù¾çÇÑ ´ÏÄÌƼŸ´½ ±â±¸°¡ ÇöÀç ½ÃÆǵǰí ÀÖ´Ù. ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ ´ÏÄÌƼŸ´½ ÆÄÀÏ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀº »þÇÁÆ® µðÀÚÀÎÀ̳ª, »èÁ¦³¯ÀÇ °¢µµ, ¶óµð¾Ë ·£µå µîÀÇ °íÀ¯ÇÑ ÇüÅÂÀû Ư¡À» °¡Áö¸ç, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Æ¯¼º¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ±Ù°ü ¼ºÇü ½Ã ƯÈ÷ ±Ù°ü Áß½ÉÀÇ º¯À§³ª Á÷¼±È­ µîÀÌ ´Ù¸£°Ô ³ªÅ¸³­´Ù. K3 ´ÏÄÌƼŸ´½ ÆÄÀÏ(SybronEndo, West Collins, CA, USA)Àº ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ ÆÄÀÏ°ú ¸¶Âù°¡Áö·Î ÇÑ ±â±¸³»¿¡¼­´Â ÀÏÁ¤ÇÑ »þÇÁÆ®ÀÇ °æ»çµµ¸¦ °¡Áø ÆÄÀÏ·Î, Ⱦ´Ü¸é¿¡¼­ 3°³ÀÇ ºñ´ëĪÀûÀÎ ¶óµð¾Ë ·£µå¸¦ °¡Áø °ÍÀÌ Æ¯Â¡ÀûÀÌ´Ù8). Á¦Á¶»ç¿¡ ÀÇÇϸé Relief°¡ ¾ø´Â 3¹ø° ¶óµð¾Ë ·£µå´Â ±Ù°ü ³»¿¡ ÆÄÀÏÀÌ ¹ÚÇô ºñƲ¾îÁö´Â °ÍÀ» ¿¹¹æÇÏ°í, ±â±¸¸¦ ¾ÈÁ¤È­ÇÏ¿© ³Ê¹« ¸¹Àº È®´ë°¡ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö´Â °ÍÀ» ¿¹¹æÇÑ´Ù°í ÇÑ´Ù8). K3 ÆÄÀÏÀº À¯¿¬¼ºÀ» Áõ°¡½ÃÅ°±â À§ÇØ °í¾ÈµÈ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÄÚ¾î Á÷°æÀ» Ư¡À¸·Î Çϸç, ledge³ª ±Ù°ü º¯À§, õ°øÀ» ÁÙÀ̱â À§ÇÑ safe-ended tipÀ» °¡Áö°í ÀÖ´Ù8,9). ¸î¸î ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ K3 ±â±¸°¡ ÃÖ¼ÒÀÇ ±Ù´Ü º¯À§¸¦ À¯¹ßÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ¾ú´Ù10,11). ProTaper ½Ã½ºÅÛ(Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland)Àº ÇÑ ÆÄÀÏÀÇ »þÇÁÆ® ³»¿¡ ´Ù¾çÇÑ °æ»çµµ¸¦ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç Ⱦ´Ü¸éÀÌ º¼·ÏÇÑ »ï°¢Çü ¸ð¾çÀ» Ư¡À¸·Î ÇÑ´Ù. ÃÖ±Ù °³¹ßµÈ ProTaper Universal ½Ã½ºÅÛÀº ¿ø·¡ µðÀÚÀÎÀÇ º¯ÇüÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿© À¯¿¬¼ºÀ» ´õ¿í Çâ»ó½ÃÄ×´Ù12). ProTaper Universal ½Ã½ºÅÛÀº 3°³ÀÇ shaping file(Sx, S1, S2)¿Í 5°³ÀÇ finishing file (F1, F2, F3, F4, F5)·Î ±¸¼ºµÇ¾î ÀÖ´Ù. S ½Ã¸®Áî¿Í F1¿¡¼­´Â ¿¹Àü°ú À¯»çÇÑ »ï°¢Çü ÇüÅÂÀÇ ´Ü¸é µðÀÚÀÎÀ» °¡ÁöÁö¸¸, F2, F3, F4, F5´Â »ï°¢Çü ´Ü¸éÀÇ °¢ º¯ °¡¿îµ¥¿¡ ȨÀÌ ÆÐÀÎ ÇüŸ¦ ºÎ¿©ÇÏ¿© À¯¿¬¼ºÀ» ´õ¿í Çâ»ó ½ÃÄ×´Ù. ¶Ç ´Ù¸¥ Ư¡À¸·Î ÆÄÀÏ »þÇÁÆ® »óºÎ¿¡ ÀÛÀº °æ»çµµ¸¦ ºÎ¿©ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ÆÄÀÏÀÇ À¯¿¬¼º º¸°­°ú ÇÔ²² ±Ù´ÜºÎ ¼ºÇü ½Ã ±Ù´ÜºÎ·ÎºÎÅÍÀÇ ÃË°¢À» ´õ Àß À¯ÁöÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô °í¾ÈµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¯È­·Î½á, Á¦Á¶»ç´Â ÆÄÀÏÀÌ Àü ±æÀÌ¿¡ °ÉÃÄ ´õ À¯¿¬ÇØÁ³´Ù°í ÁÖÀåÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ »õ ProTaper Universal ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÌ °ú°Å ProTaper ½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ´õ¿í À¯¿¬ÇØÁ³À½ÀÌ ±è µî13)ÀÇ À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò ¿¬±¸¿¡ ÀÇÇؼ­µµ Áõ¸íµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¶Ç ´Ù¸¥ ÇϳªÀÇ Æ¯ÀÌÇÑ ÆÄÀÏ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ¸·Î, LightSpeed (Lightspeed Technology, Inc., San Antonio, TX, USA) ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ´Â »èÁ¦³¯ÀÌ ¾ø´Â µÕ±Ù »þÇÁÆ®¿Í ¾à 1-2mmÀÇ ÀÛÀº »èÁ¦ ¸»´ÜÀ» °®´Â ÆÄÀÏÀÌ´Ù. Á¦Á¶»ç´Â ÀÌ ÆÄÀÏÀÇ »þÇÁÆ®°¡ °æ»çµµ°¡ ¾ø°í »èÁ¦ ¸»´ÜºÎº¸´Ù ÀÛÀº Á÷°æÀÇ µÕ±Ù ´Ü¸é »þÇÁÆ®¸¦ °¡ÁüÀ¸·Î½á À¯¿¬¼ºÀÌ Áõ°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù°í ÁÖÀåÇÑ´Ù14). LightSpeed ±â±¸´Â ƯÈ÷ ±Ù°ü ÷ºÎ¸¦ Å©°Ô ¼ºÇüÇÒ ¶§µµ ¿ø·¡ÀÇ ±Ù°ü ¸¸°îÀ» ¾ÈÀüÇÏ°íµµ È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î Àß À¯ÁöÇÑ´Ù°í º¸°íµÇ¾ú´Ù15-19). ±â±¸ÀÇ µðÀÚÀÎÀ̳ª »èÁ¦ ±â¼ú°ú °ü°è ¾øÀÌ, ±Ù°ü ¼ºÇüÀÇ °úÁ¤Àº ±Ù°ü º®À¸·ÎºÎÅÍ »ó¾ÆÁúÀÇ Á¦°Å¸¦ µ¿¹ÝÇÏ°Ô µÈ´Ù20). ¸¸°î ±Ù°üÀÇ °æ¿ì, Àüµ¿ ÆÄÀÏÀÇ »ç¿ë °á°ú ¸¸°îÀÇ ¿ÜÃø ¹æÇâÀ¸·ÎÀÇ °úµµÇÑ »ó¾ÆÁú Á¦°Å°¡ ÀϾ°Ô µÇ¾î ±Ù°ü º¯À§°¡ ³ªÅ¸³ª°Ô µÈ´Ù21). Weineµî22)Àº ¸ðµç ÆÄÀÏÀº ¸¸°îµÈ ±Ù°üÀ» Á÷¼±È­ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ ±â±¸ Á¶ÀÛÀº ¸¸°îµÈ ±Ù°ü¿¡¼­ ±Ù´ÜºÎ º¯À§¸¦ ¾ß±âÇÑ´Ù°í ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ´Â ¼º°øÀûÀÎ Ä¡±Ù´Ü ºÀ¼â¸¦ ¾ò±â Èûµé°Ô ÇÏ°í, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±Ù´ÜºÎ º¯À§´Â ±â±¸ÀÇ Å©±â°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï ´õ Ä¿Áú °ÍÀÌ´Ù. À̹ø ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ¼­·Î ´Ù¸¥ »þÇÁÆ®ÀÇ Æ¯Â¡Àû ÇüŸ¦ °¡Áø 3°¡Áö Àüµ¿ ´ÏÄÌƼŸ´½ ÆÄÀÏ(LightSpeed eXtra, ProTaper Universal, K3)À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ±Ù´ÜºÎ Å©±â¸¦ 30, 40, 50¹øÀ¸·Î È®´ëÇÑ °Í¿¡ µû¸¥ ±Ù°ü º¯À§ ¹× ¸¸°îµµÀÇ °¨¼Ò·®À» ºñ±³ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

The purpose of this study was to compare the centering ratio and reduction of canal curvature according to the preparation sizes of #30, #40 and #50 using three rotary NiTi instruments which have different shaft tapers. Seventy-two simulated root canals in clear resin blocks (Endo Training Bloc; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) were divided as following 3 groups according to the file system; the 24 canal blocks prepared with each of ProTaper Universal system (Group P), LightSpeed eXtra system (Group L), and K3 (Group K). The pre- and post-instrumented root canals were scanned and superimposed to evaluate and calculate the centering ratio and reduction of canal curvature. Mean scores of each group were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan¡¯s multiple range test for post-hoc comparison. The results were as followings: 1. Group L showed better centering ratio, followed by K and P. And all experimental groups generally showed increasing tendency of centering ratio as the apical size was increasing from #30 to #50, except at 1 mm level of group P where showed reducing tendency of centering ratio. The smaller the ratio, the better the instrument remained centered in the canal. 2. Group P showed more decrease of canal curvature at all apical shaping size (p < 0.05) Under the conditions of this study, the shaft design could affect the quality of canal shaping and the smooth taperless flexible (LightSpeed) shaft design was capable of preparing canals with good morphological characteristics in curved canals.

Å°¿öµå

LightSpeed eXtra;ProTaper Universal;K3;shaft taper;centering ratio;Canal curvature

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI